Thursday, April 18, 2013

New Historicism

- Interpreting the book as a product of its time and culture -


Kingsolver wrote The Poisonwood Bible in 1998, but the novel was set in the Congo in the 1960s.

The Congo in the 1960s:
     January 4, 1959 - The Leopoldville riots
     May 1, 1960 - Independence
     July 5, 1960 - U.N. Intervention
     September 4, 1960 - Military Coup

The World in the 1960s:
     Cold War, Vietnam War, Space Exploration, Counterculture Movement, Civil Rights Movement

1998 - the Second Congo War

Kingsolver wrote about the 1960s by looking back on history with a modern perspective. The Second Congo War began in 1998. Although Kingsolver probably was well into the novel by then, knowledge of the troubles in Africa would have influenced her writing.

Kingsolver's modern knowledge about the 1960s also helped her write the book within the context of the 1960s culture. The Cold War affected the story, for example, the mentions of the "Communist Boy Scouts." Throughout the beginning of the book, we have heard mentions of Leopoldville, which could later lead to significance with the Leopoldville riots. Throughout we have also heard mentions of rebellion, leading up to independence, including mention of leader Patrice Lumumba.

The Price family was plopped into the middle of a culture they knew nothing about. They don't fully understand what is occuring and about to occur yet. The time setting will affect their story, and so the historical knowledge of the road to independence in the Congo is very important to the novel.

Also, the culture of how to give aid to Africa affects the book. The Prices may have good intentions, but they are not acting in the proper manner. The context supports the notion aid, but condemns the way in which it comes. The 1998 perspective on both Communism and the Civil Rights movement also greatly affects the portrayal in the novel. In the novel, we see prospects of a self-functioning village, of white intervention, and of prejudice and stereotypes.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Heart of Darkness vs. Apocalypse Now

I guess I hit the PANIC BUTTON on this one.

The most obvious, but I believe also most important, difference between the novel and movie was the change of setting. Heart of Darkness was set in the Congo during the imperialist colonial era. In Apocalypse Now, the story was moved to the Vietnam War. This change shows that the problems in Leopold's Congo can translate to any enterprise of conquer, in any place, for any reason, and with any people. Conquerers inevitably see those whom they conquer as different from them, and usually, therefore, less human than them. In the struggle for power, in the craziness of political conquer, participants can do insane things. A character like Kurtz seemed equally possible in both the Congo and Vietnam, and this shows he could pop up anywhere.